DAB-DETR ResNet-50
Dynamic Anchor Boxes DETR for end-to-end object detection with transformer architecture
DAB-DETR (Dynamic Anchor Box DETR) is an improved version of DETR that uses dynamic anchor boxes instead of learned object queries. This approach provides better localization and faster convergence during training.
When to Use DAB-DETR ResNet-50
Good fit for:
- End-to-end object detection without NMS post-processing
- When you need interpretable anchor box mechanisms
- Applications requiring precise localization
- Projects where training efficiency matters
Consider alternatives if:
- You need real-time inference (use YOLO instead)
- Working with very small objects (try Deformable DETR)
- Limited computational resources (use smaller models)
Strengths
- Better localization: Dynamic anchor boxes improve bounding box prediction accuracy
- Faster convergence: Trains faster than standard DETR
- No NMS required: End-to-end detection without post-processing
- Interpretable: Anchor box mechanism is more transparent than learned queries
- ResNet-50 backbone: Good balance of accuracy and speed
Weaknesses
- Computational cost: Still requires significant compute compared to YOLO
- Small object challenges: Struggles with very small objects
- Memory intensive: Transformer architecture needs substantial memory
- Long training time: Despite improvements, still slower to train than one-stage detectors
Architecture Overview
DAB-DETR builds on the DETR architecture with key improvements:
- Dynamic Anchor Boxes: Instead of learned object queries, uses anchor boxes that dynamically adjust
- ResNet-50 Backbone: Extracts visual features from input images
- Transformer Encoder: Processes feature maps with self-attention
- Transformer Decoder: Uses anchor boxes to attend to relevant features
- Prediction Heads: Outputs class labels and refined bounding boxes
The dynamic anchor box approach provides explicit spatial priors, leading to faster convergence and better localization.
Parameters
Training Configuration
Training Images: Directory containing training images organized for object detection.
Annotations: JSON file with COCO-format annotations containing bounding boxes and labels.
Batch Size: Default 2, adjust based on GPU memory (16GB GPU: 2, 24GB GPU: 4, 32GB+ GPU: 8)
Epochs: Default 300, adjust based on dataset size (<1k: 150-200, 1k-10k: 200-300, >10k: 100-200)
Learning Rate: Default 1e-4, range 1e-5 to 1e-3 (fine-tuning: 1e-5 to 5e-5, from scratch: 1e-4 to 5e-4)
Evaluation Steps: Default 100, adjust based on dataset size
Model-Specific Parameters
Number of Queries: Default 100 (maximum objects detectable per image) Hidden Dimension: Default 256 Number of Heads: Default 8 Encoder Layers: Default 6 Decoder Layers: Default 6
Configuration Tips
By Dataset Size
Small (<1k images): batch_size 2, epochs 150-200, learning_rate 5e-5, use strong data augmentation
Medium (1k-10k): batch_size 4, epochs 200-300, learning_rate 1e-4, balance augmentation
Large (>10k): batch_size 8, epochs 100-200, learning_rate 1e-4 to 5e-4, less aggressive augmentation
Hardware Requirements
Minimum: 16GB GPU, 16GB RAM Recommended: 24GB+ GPU, 32GB RAM Optimal: Multiple A100s, 64GB+ RAM
Common Issues and Solutions
- Out of Memory: Reduce batch_size, use gradient accumulation, reduce image resolution
- Slow Convergence: Use learning rate warmup, increase learning rate, check data augmentation
- Poor mAP on Small Objects: Increase image resolution, add multi-scale training, try Deformable DETR
- Training Instability: Lower learning rate, add gradient clipping, use warmup
- Overfitting: Add augmentation, reduce epochs, add weight decay
Example Use Cases
- Autonomous Driving: Pedestrian detection with precise localization
- Retail: Product detection on shelves with many objects per image
- Medical Imaging: Tumor detection requiring precise localization
Comparison with Alternatives
- vs. Standard DETR: Faster convergence, better localization
- vs. Deformable DETR: Simpler architecture, slightly worse on small objects
- vs. YOLOv8: Much slower but more accurate, end-to-end simplicity
- vs. Mask R-CNN: End-to-end, faster training, detection-only