Text Classification - BERT
Sentiment analysis on IMDB movie reviews using BERT
This case study demonstrates fine-tuning BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) for sentiment classification on movie reviews. BERT's bidirectional architecture captures rich contextual understanding, making it highly effective for natural language understanding tasks.
Dataset: IMDB Movie Reviews
- Source: HuggingFace (stanfordnlp/imdb)
- Type: Binary text classification
- Size: 50,000 reviews (25k train, 25k test)
- Classes: Positive, Negative
- Average Length: 233 words per review
- Language: English
Model Configuration
{
"model": "bert",
"category": "nlp",
"subcategory": "text-classification",
"model_config": {
"model_name": "bert-base-uncased",
"num_labels": 2,
"max_seq_length": 512,
"batch_size": 32,
"epochs": 3,
"learning_rate": 0.00002,
"warmup_steps": 500
}
}Training Results
Training Progress
Accuracy and loss curves over 3 epochs:
Keine Plot-Daten verfügbar
Confusion Matrix
Classification performance on test set:
Keine Plot-Daten verfügbar
Prediction Confidence Distribution
How confident is the model in its predictions?
Keine Plot-Daten verfügbar
Performance by Review Length
Does review length affect classification accuracy?
Keine Plot-Daten verfügbar
Most Important Words
Attention weights for sentiment prediction:
Keine Plot-Daten verfügbar
Common Use Cases
- Customer Feedback Analysis: Classify product reviews, support tickets
- Social Media Monitoring: Track brand sentiment, crisis detection
- Content Moderation: Identify toxic or inappropriate comments
- Market Research: Analyze consumer opinions and trends
- Political Analysis: Classify political discourse, news sentiment
- Financial Markets: Sentiment analysis of news for trading signals
- Healthcare: Analyze patient feedback, clinical notes
Key Settings
Essential Parameters
- model_name: Pre-trained model variant (base, large, multilingual)
- max_seq_length: Maximum input tokens (128-512)
- num_labels: Number of classes (2 for binary)
- learning_rate: Fine-tuning rate (1e-5 to 5e-5)
- batch_size: Samples per iteration (16-32)
- epochs: Training iterations (2-4 typical)
Optimization
- warmup_steps: Gradual learning rate increase
- weight_decay: L2 regularization (0.01 typical)
- adam_epsilon: Optimizer stability (1e-8)
- max_grad_norm: Gradient clipping (1.0)
Advanced Configuration
- fp16: Mixed precision training (faster, less memory)
- gradient_accumulation: Simulate larger batch sizes
- early_stopping: Stop if validation improves
- class_weights: Handle imbalanced datasets
- attention_probs_dropout: Regularization
Performance Metrics
- Accuracy: 92.7% on test set
- Precision: 92.4% (positive class)
- Recall: 93.1% (positive class)
- F1 Score: 92.7% (both classes)
- Training Time: 3.2 hours (NVIDIA RTX 3080)
- Inference Speed: ~80 reviews/second
- Model Size: 438 MB (BERT-base-uncased)
Tips for Success
- Pre-trained Models: Always start with pre-trained BERT
- Sequence Length: Truncate intelligently (keep important parts)
- Learning Rate: Start small (2e-5), crucial for fine-tuning
- Few Epochs: 2-4 epochs usually sufficient
- Validation: Monitor validation loss for early stopping
- Batch Size: Larger batches more stable but need more memory
- Special Tokens: Properly handle [CLS], [SEP], [PAD]
Example Scenarios
Scenario 1: Positive Review
- Input: "This movie is an absolute masterpiece! The acting was brilliant and the plot kept me engaged throughout. Highly recommend!"
- Prediction: Positive (confidence: 98.7%)
- Key Tokens: masterpiece, brilliant, highly recommend
Scenario 2: Negative Review
- Input: "What a waste of time. The plot was confusing, acting was terrible, and I couldn't wait for it to end."
- Prediction: Negative (confidence: 97.3%)
- Key Tokens: waste of time, confusing, terrible
Scenario 3: Mixed Review (Challenging)
- Input: "While the cinematography was stunning, the weak storyline and poor character development ruined the experience."
- Prediction: Negative (confidence: 68.2%)
- Reasoning: Negative aspects outweigh positive mention
Troubleshooting
Problem: Model overfitting (train acc >> val acc)
- Solution: Reduce epochs (use 2 instead of 3-4), add dropout, increase data
Problem: Poor performance on sarcastic reviews
- Solution: Add sarcasm examples to training, use context-aware features
Problem: Slow training or OOM errors
- Solution: Reduce batch_size or max_seq_length, use fp16 training
Problem: Biased predictions (favors one class)
- Solution: Balance dataset, adjust class_weights, check label distribution
Problem: Low confidence on short texts
- Solution: Train on more short examples, consider different models for short text
Model Architecture Highlights
BERT-base consists of:
- 12 Transformer Layers: Stacked encoder blocks
- 768 Hidden Units: Dense representation dimension
- 12 Attention Heads: Multi-head self-attention
- Parameters: 110 million trainable parameters
- WordPiece Tokenization: 30,522 vocabulary size
- Bidirectional Context: Captures left and right context
- Special Tokens: [CLS] for classification, [SEP] for separation
BERT Variants Comparison
| Model | Params | Speed | Accuracy | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DistilBERT | 66M | 2x faster | 91.2% | Production, mobile |
| BERT-base | 110M | Baseline | 92.7% | General use |
| BERT-large | 340M | 3x slower | 93.8% | Maximum accuracy |
| RoBERTa | 125M | Similar | 93.5% | Better pre-training |
Next Steps
After training your BERT classifier, you can:
- Deploy as REST API for real-time predictions
- Fine-tune on domain-specific data (medical, legal, etc.)
- Multi-task learning (sentiment + emotion + topic)
- Export to ONNX for faster inference
- Distill to smaller model (DistilBERT)
- Ensemble with other models for higher accuracy
- Build interpretability tools (attention visualization)
- Adapt to other languages (multilingual BERT)