Tabular Classification - Random Forest
Predict survival on the Titanic dataset using Random Forest classification
This case study demonstrates training a Random Forest classifier to predict passenger survival on the famous Titanic dataset. Random Forest is an ensemble learning method that combines multiple decision trees to create a robust, accurate classifier resistant to overfitting.
Dataset: Titanic Survival
- Source: Kaggle
- Type: Tabular classification
- Size: 891 passengers
- Features: Age, Sex, Passenger Class, Fare, Embarkation Port, etc.
- Target: Survived (0 = No, 1 = Yes)
Model Configuration
{
"model": "random_forest",
"category": "classification",
"model_config": {
"n_estimators": 100,
"max_depth": 10,
"min_samples_split": 5,
"min_samples_leaf": 2,
"criterion": "gini",
"random_state": 42
}
}Training Results
Feature Importance
Understanding which features most influenced survival predictions:
Keine Plot-Daten verfügbar
Confusion Matrix
Model performance across predicted vs actual survival:
Keine Plot-Daten verfügbar
ROC Curve
Receiver Operating Characteristic showing model discrimination ability:
Keine Plot-Daten verfügbar
Common Use Cases
- Customer Churn Prediction: Identify customers likely to leave
- Loan Default Risk: Assess creditworthiness of applicants
- Medical Diagnosis: Classify disease presence from patient data
- Quality Control: Detect defective products in manufacturing
- Fraud Detection: Identify suspicious transactions
Key Settings
Essential Parameters
- n_estimators: Number of trees (100-500 typical)
- max_depth: Maximum tree depth (controls overfitting)
- min_samples_split: Minimum samples to split a node
- criterion: Split quality measure (gini or entropy)
Advanced Configuration
- class_weight: Handle imbalanced datasets ("balanced" or custom)
- max_features: Features to consider per split
- bootstrap: Whether to use bootstrap samples
- oob_score: Out-of-bag score estimation
Performance Metrics
- Accuracy: 85.3% - Overall correct predictions
- Precision: 88.1% - Of predicted survivors, 88.1% actually survived
- Recall: 77.4% - Of actual survivors, 77.4% were identified
- F1 Score: 82.4% - Harmonic mean of precision and recall
- AUC-ROC: 0.89 - Strong discrimination ability
Tips for Success
- Feature Engineering: Create meaningful features (e.g., family size, title extraction)
- Handle Missing Data: Impute or remove missing values strategically
- Encoding: Convert categorical variables to numerical (one-hot, label encoding)
- Hyperparameter Tuning: Use grid search or random search for optimization
- Cross-Validation: Validate on multiple folds to ensure generalization
Example Scenarios
Scenario 1: High-Class Female Passenger
- Features: Female, 1st class, age 28, fare $75
- Prediction: Survived (probability: 0.92)
- Reasoning: Women and children first policy, higher class priority
Scenario 2: Third-Class Male Passenger
- Features: Male, 3rd class, age 35, fare $8
- Prediction: Did not survive (probability: 0.78)
- Reasoning: Lower priority in evacuation, limited lifeboat access
Troubleshooting
Problem: Model overfitting (high training accuracy, low test accuracy)
- Solution: Reduce max_depth, increase min_samples_split, use fewer features
Problem: Imbalanced classes affecting predictions
- Solution: Set class_weight='balanced' or use SMOTE for oversampling
Problem: Training too slow with large dataset
- Solution: Reduce n_estimators, use max_samples for subsample training
Next Steps
After training your Random Forest model, you can:
- Deploy for real-time predictions
- Compare with other algorithms (XGBoost, SVM)
- Create ensemble models combining multiple classifiers
- Export feature importance for interpretability